Shaping Ideas. Challenging Perspectives. Defining the Future. 🌍✨
Shaping Ideas. Challenging Perspectives. Defining the Future. 🌍✨
⚖️ This House Believes That Convicted Sex Offenders Should Replace Animals in Scientific Testing
Can the pursuit of scientific advancement justify the use of convicted offenders as research subjects? Or does such a proposal violate the fundamental principle of human dignity?
🔬 Prop: Argues this could reduce animal suffering and produce more accurate human-centered results.
🏛️ Oppo: Maintains that all individuals, regardless of crimes, retain basic human rights and must not be subjected to experimentation.
Prepare your arguments, challenge assumptions, and defend your stance in a debate that promises to test both your reasoning and your values.
🎤 Take the floor. Make your case. Change minds.
⚠️ APPLICATION DIRECTIVE
We are looking for sharp, direct, and ambitious minds. Selection is based on merit, analytical rigor, and the ability to engage with complex ethical questions.
📅 Deadline: 26th June | 23.59 GMT+0 (Strictly Enforced)
🔗 Access via Google forms: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/1cPyqkfIHsIRfYVkHuTj02eQHpVJd6H01kTWQPsZFMkU/edit?ts=6a26b277
The most difficult questions rarely have easy answers. This is your opportunity to confront them, challenge prevailing assumptions, and compete among the brightest minds.
Shaping Ideas. Challenging Perspectives. Defining the Future. 🌍✨
Committees
Organizers

