APX MUN 2026

APEX MUN

Apr 4–5, 2026 Online

APEX MUN

Conference

Online

Apr 4–5, 2026

500 delegates expected

High school and university students

In English

How it went

3.2421 ratings from delegates
Academics
3.43
Logistics
3.10
Socials
3.19

About

Diplomacy at Its Peak

 

  Apex MUN | March 28–29, 2026

Step into the world of high-stakes diplomacy at Apex MUN, where the next generation of leaders convenes to tackle some of the most pressing crises facing our world. This year, we bring you two dynamic and immersive committees designed to challenge your intellect, strategic thinking, and negotiation skills:

  • WHO (World Health Organization): The world is facing a critical global health crisis. As delegates, you will confront the challenges of pandemics, emerging diseases, and international health policy. Your decisions could shape the fate of millions — can you coordinate, strategize, and save lives on a global scale? 
  • WWIII (World War III Simulation): The world teeters on the edge of global conflict. Nations are clashing, alliances are fragile, and every decision could escalate tensions. Navigate diplomacy, crisis management, and high-pressure negotiations in a simulation where strategy, foresight, and collaboration are the keys to preventing catastrophe.  

At Apex MUN, delegates will not just debate — they will experience the intensity of real-world diplomacy, learn to think critically under pressure, and develop leadership skills that extend far beyond the conference room. This is more than a simulation — it is a crisis-driven, transformative experience that empowers you to act, influence, and make your voice heard on a global stage.

📅 Dates: March 28–29, 2026
🌍 Open to delegates worldwide
🔥 Are you ready to rise to the challenge and lead through crisis?

Committees

  • 189 countries
    1. CRISIS!!!
    • Sam Iyer
    • Akshra Garg
    • Adisurya Hari

    WHO

    Intermediate · English · 189 countries
  • 193 countries
    1. Delibration on the reducing of the effects of carbon emission with special emphasis on sustainabke energy sources
    • Ranvir Srivastava
    • Khushi Shetye
    • Anmol Grewal

    UNEP

    Beginner · English · 193 countries

    Topic

    Delibration on the reducing of the effects of carbon emission with special emphasis on sustainabke energy sources

    About the committee

    The world faces urgent environmental crises that threaten ecosystems, economies, and human lives. As delegates in UNEP, you will tackle high-pressure global challenges, negotiate international policies, and propose actionable solutions to protect the planet. From climate change to biodiversity loss, every decision you make has far-reaching consequences. Agenda : Biodiversity Conservation and Ecosystem Preservation with Emphasis on Protection of Endangered Species, Sustainable Resource Management, and International Collaboration to Prevent Environmental Collapse

    Chairs

    Countries

    How this committee type works
  • 15 countries
    1. The Republic of Estonia and France have brought a case against the Russian Federation before the International Court of Justice, alleging that a coordinated cyberattack disrupted critical infrastructure in multiple countries, including Estonia, France, and allied nations, causing widespread blackouts, financial losses, and disruption to essential public services. Investigations suggest that Russia orchestrated the attacks, Japan is accused of financially supporting these operations, and Germany is allegedly exploiting the resulting chaos to gain strategic economic advantages. Estonia and France seek reparations and formal recognition of responsibility from the accused states. The ICJ must determine whether Russia bears state responsibility for the cyberattacks, assess Japan’s liability in funding the operations, consider Germany’s role in profiting from the crisis, and decide on appropriate reparations or sanctions. Judges will deliberate based on international law, previous ICJ rulings, and relevant treaties, while claimants present evidence and arguments, accused states defend their positions, and observers, including UN officials and cyber law experts, may provide advisory input.
    • Harini Govindhasamy
    • Vinayak Khajuria
    • Varad Jadhav

    ICJ

    Expert · English · 15 countries

    Topic

    The Republic of Estonia and France have brought a case against the Russian Federation before the International Court of Justice, alleging that a coordinated cyberattack disrupted critical infrastructure in multiple countries, including Estonia, France, and allied nations, causing widespread blackouts, financial losses, and disruption to essential public services. Investigations suggest that Russia orchestrated the attacks, Japan is accused of financially supporting these operations, and Germany is allegedly exploiting the resulting chaos to gain strategic economic advantages. Estonia and France seek reparations and formal recognition of responsibility from the accused states. The ICJ must determine whether Russia bears state responsibility for the cyberattacks, assess Japan’s liability in funding the operations, consider Germany’s role in profiting from the crisis, and decide on appropriate reparations or sanctions. Judges will deliberate based on international law, previous ICJ rulings, and relevant treaties, while claimants present evidence and arguments, accused states defend their positions, and observers, including UN officials and cyber law experts, may provide advisory input.

    About the committee

    The Republic of Estonia and France have brought a case against the Russian Federation before the International Court of Justice, alleging that a coordinated cyberattack disrupted critical infrastructure in multiple countries, including Estonia, France, and allied nations, causing widespread blackouts, financial losses, and disruption to essential public services. Investigations suggest that Russia orchestrated the attacks, Japan is accused of financially supporting these operations, and Germany is allegedly exploiting the resulting chaos to gain strategic economic advantages. Estonia and France seek reparations and formal recognition of responsibility from the accused states. The ICJ must determine whether Russia bears state responsibility for the cyberattacks, assess Japan’s liability in funding the operations, consider Germany’s role in profiting from the crisis, and decide on appropriate reparations or sanctions. Judges will deliberate based on international law, previous ICJ rulings, and relevant treaties, while claimants present evidence and arguments, accused states defend their positions, and observers, including UN officials and cyber law experts, may provide advisory input.

    Chairs

    Countries

    How this committee type works
  • 195 countries
    1. Agenda: To strengthen international cooperation and establish global norms to prevent and respond to cyber warfare
    • arnav dixit
    • Shiamak Mansingh
    • Srishti Katyal
    • Anuron Taye

    UNSC

    Beginner · English · 195 countries

    Topic

    Agenda: To strengthen international cooperation and establish global norms to prevent and respond to cyber warfare

    Chairs

    Countries

    How this committee type works
  • 86 countries
    • Maria Alphy . A
    • Saketh Menon
    • Ninaad Ghoshal
    • Adisurya Hari

    WWIII Committee

    Intermediate · English · 86 countries

Organizers

More MUN conferences

ConferencesOnlineAPX MUN 2026